VI
|
Functional Requirements for
Appraisal Tool
[Decision Assistance and
Documentation]
|
Date: 03 August 1993
Ref: IRM/RAM/93-167
Sub:
|
Para
|
Pri
|
Wei
|
Requirement or Specification
|
Details or comments
|
|
1
|
|
|
The Goal of Tool is:
|
|
|
1a
|
|
|
to assist pick/or fill in
information concerning the item or grouping
|
(description of item or grouping
important)
|
|
1b
|
|
|
to give a suggested retention
period for a series, folder or record item
- irrespective of Box stored or Shipment/Accession
|
retention period will be based
on choices selected in F1
|
|
1c
|
|
|
to provide [printed] Reports
showing decision and reasons for decision and exceptions that were
considered.
|
[choices selected and any narrative
reflecting interpretation]
|
|
2
|
|
|
CONSIDERATIONS/EXCEPTIONS/ASSUMPTIONS
|
Process of elimination
|
|
2a
|
|
|
The Question: "Are there
exceptions" must be posed at regular intervals
|
If answer "there are no
exceptions" then proceed. If yes
then different schedule may apply
|
|
2b
|
|
|
When making selections it may
also be necessary to determine what item or group is not.
|
In some cases this will
eliminate a whole set or subset of Questions from consideration
|
|
2c
|
|
|
Decision at lowest level would
cascade up to higher level for longest date.
|
Box
to Shipment
Folder to Box
and
Folder
to Series
|
|
2d
|
|
|
Decision at higher level could
cascade to lower level.
|
|
|
2e
|
|
|
Exception Question must be
raised for F@c and F2d: Do all Records in this Box or Series conform to the
Series Description.
|
If
some records do not:
Identify
which ones and begin Appraisal Process for exceptions.
|
|
3
|
|
|
BUSINESS MODEL & Process/Function/Product/Entity orientated]
|
Values can be assigned to items
or groups of Items [Series]
|
|
3a
|
|
|
Appraisal Values could be
related to Information Products which are "linked" to: functions
and/or Processes (& reverse) or Entities [and all Functions/Process
performed]
|
If assigned to Entities they
might have impact on retention times related to function/processes.
|
|
4
|
|
|
MULTIPLE VIEWS AND LINKING
VALUES, Matrix Considerations
|
Multiple ways to begin
appraisal.
|
|
4a
|
|
|
Criteria would be linked and
cross checked as they are applied to item.
|
Values would be challenged or
refined as different retention values were suggested by conflicting rules.
|
|
4b
|
|
|
Need to be able to appraise,
based on what ever is known at the time about item. Later consider subset or additional
information.
|
|
|
4c
|
|
|
Need to be able to apply what
ever criteria is available. Later
revise based on new or more detailed criteria.
|
Decision would be suggested
based on what known
|
|